Showing posts with label green. Show all posts
Showing posts with label green. Show all posts

Friday, February 06, 2009

Earth's Best Organic Baby Food @ Amazon.com

Grocery prices are outrageous, and Amazon.com is as susceptible to as anyone to price increases. But their extensive line of non-perishable groceries include a lot of products that may not be available in smaller markets, and they may be cheaper than the same items in large urban centers. This is especially true when you include transportation costs, since most items qualify for free shipping on orders over $25.

In spite of the competitive nature of the grocery business, I'm sure many people could save time and money by having Amazon deliver their groceries. I think the problem is that too many people just don't realize that the service is available. Even fewer realize that they can save an additional 15% and automatically qualifiy for free shipping with the Subscribe and Save program.

This is definitely a niche marketing proposition. Unfortunately Amazon doesn't ship any variety of Hormel Spam to Hawaii where it is very popular and shipping costs are high. We'll be featuring more products as our geographically diverse customer base brings the hidden values to our attention.

Today we're featuring Earth's Best Organic Baby Food, a great product line that may not be available in many local stores, and you can save another 15% by entering the coupon code EARTHBE3 at checkout on many selected items through February. Hover your mouse over the product name for current pricing, or click to go straight to the page. You can also click on the "aStore" links for a faster-loading "Amazon Lite" page. Here are just a few of the popular products available:

1st Sweet Potato (24)aStore
1st Pears (24)aStore
1st Peas (24)aStore
1st Carrots (24)aStore
1st Bananas (24)aStore
2nd Antioxidant Variety Pack (12)aStore
2nd Country Gourmet Meals Pack (12)aStore
2nd Dinner Variety Pack (12)aStore
2nd Fruit Variety Pack (12)aStore
2nd Vegetable Variety Pack (12)aStore
2nd Seasonal Harvest Variety Pack (12)aStore
2nd Strained Pear Mango (12)aStore
2nd Plum/Banana/Rice (24)aStore
2nd Beef Carrots & Corn (12)aStore
2nd Chicken Tomato Pasta (12)aStore
2nd Banana Apricot Mixed Grain (24)aStore
Sesame Street (Toddler) Organic Crunchin' Crackers (6)aStore
Toddler Snackin' Fruit Hearts Blueberry (12)aStore
Toddler Sunny Days Snack Bars, Apple (6)aStore
Sesame Street (Toddler) Organic Cookies, Oatmeal Cinnamon (6)aStore
Tots Cereal Bars, Strawberry (6)aStore
Tots Cereal Bar, Strawberry Banana (6)aStore
Tots Apple Peach Banana JuiceaStore

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Real World Economics

Few Americans would profess much understanding of economics. In fact, they understand economics perfectly. It is the arcane mumbo-jumbo of econometrics and finance that confounds them. As former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan testified, he doesn't really understand those disciplines either.

The traditional definition of economics is: the study of the allocation of scarce resources. These are the everyday "kitchen table" issues we all deal with on a daily basis. I think people understand well enough that if you spend money on one thing, it's no longer available to spend on something else. If you endlessly pour $10 billion a month into an ill-advised and tragically mismanaged war, you don't have it for other projects that just might possibly be more beneficial.

Moreover, most people understand something the Wall Street "geniuses" have missed -- that all the money in the world won't do you much good if the planet becomes uninhabitable. When the above definintion was posited, certain resources seemed limitless, and therefore were not considered economic commodities. How could anyone charge for clean air and water? They were freely available to all. I think it's high time that definition was ammended to read the study of the allocation of finite resources.

Just as current government economic models failed to forsee the entirely predictable housing bubble, they completely ignore The Tragedy of Commons, as described in the influential 1968 Science article by that name. The problem is that economic models are only attempts to describe the aggregate behavior of real people. When they work, they're valid. When they don't work they're B.S. Thinking that The Laffer Curve, or other complicated equations can replace common sense is the most profound lack of understanding of economics of all.

Rescinding the plutocratic Bush tax cuts isn't "class warfare," or "socialism" -- its the same progressive income tax we've had since the beginning. The notion that increasing rampant income inequality is somehow "good for the economy" is another big lie designed to scare the disenfranchised into accepting exploitation by the investor class.

Unless you reject capitalism altogether, the idea of investment is reasonable. You entrust your savings to a business in exchange for a proportional share of their profit (or loss). Some of the most successful investors, like Warren Buffet approach investing just that way. But when trading becomes an end in itself, it's no longer investment -- it's gambling. I have no moral objections to gambling, but I know this: when you lose you pay up. You don't whine to the Department of the Treasury that the mortgages you've been hawking are worthless, and therefore it's up to the taxpayers to bail you out.

Here again, the beltway brain trust has a lot of complicated explanations why this unprecedented greed and incompetence should be rewarded, while the man on the street understands perfectly -- he's being robbed blind. Never forget this lesson: The Republican Party as it exists today is the party of privelege and irresponsibility. There may be a few honorable men in that group (Chuck Hagel comes to mind), but in general they are beneath contempt and should be thrown out of office wholesale. The Democrats aren't perfect, but you can say this about them: They're not Republicans.

The proposed economic stimulus plan isn't out of committee yet, but we know two things about it. It includes investment in roads, utilities, schools, and other economic goods that people can use -- and the Republicans have suddenly come to Jesus about deficit spending. "Why invest in America? Look at all the wonderful things deregulation and sloth have produced." Don't buy it. You can tell they are lying because their mouths move.

We'll come out of this recession or depression or whatever it is just as we always do: people will tighten their belts and concentrate on necessities. People need food, but they don't need delicacies. They need clothing, but they don't need fashion. Shelter is a necessity, but ostentatious mansions are not.

In hard times, people spend less on entertainment, and more on do-it yourself activities, whether that means auto repairs, starting a nice vegetable garden, or just doing some chores for a neighbor, perhaps in exchange for a home-cooked meal.

One way or another, people find a way to be productive whether they have a job or not. Despite of the fact that most of this activity is "off the books," (or maybe because of it) eventually things begin to turn around. If Hollywood or professional sports suffer, do you really think they will suffer very much?

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Obama Cabinet Members

President-elect Obama announced the last of this cabinet-level nominations Friday. Having run on a platform that promised to unite America, the list is notable for its ethnic, gender, and ideological diversity. It is said that compromise is a solution that pleases noone, and while these cabinet picks have already been widely criticized by both the left and the right, their expertise has been little disputed.

After eight years of Karl Rove's divisive politics of the perpetual campaign, it is refreshing to see glimmerings of a return to efficacy in public life. Obama has never been the left-wing extremist that Republican spin-doctors have portrayed him as, and it appears that he intends to make good his promise to be a president for all America -- if the "loyal opposition" gives him half a chance.

Obama says he wants to have the benefit of diverse opinions and vigorous debate before setting policy and Doris Kearns Goodwin's quotable Lincoln biography -- Team of Rivals has often been referred to in this context. Reportedly, John McCain responded: "Senator, I served with Abe Lincoln. I knew Abe Lincoln. Abe Lincoln was a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Abe Lincoln." -- but I think that's just a joke.

Herewith are brief descriptions of the prospective new cabinet members, subject to Senate confirmation:

Secretary of StateHillary Clinton
Secretary of the TreasuryTimothy Geithner
Secretary of DefenseRobert Gates
Attorney GeneralEric Holder
Secretary of the InteriorKen Salazar
Secretary of AgricultureTom Vilsack
Secretary of CommerceBill Richardson
Secretary of LaborHilda Solis
Secretary of Health and Human ServicesTom Daschle
Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentShaun Donovan
Secretary of TransportationRay LaHood
Secretary of EnergySteven Chu
Secretary of EducationArne Duncan
Secretary of Veterans AffairsEric Shinseki
Secretary of Homeland SecurityJanet Napolitano

Steven Chu (Energy)

      Chu is a Nobel Laureate in physics and the director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory where he has emphasized technology to reduce greenhouse emissions. He helped to establish Stanford's Bio-X program, which encourages a multi-disciplinary team approach to problems frequently lacking in scientific research. He has also fostered cooperation between academia and industry, brokering a deal between the Berkeley Labs, the University of Illionois, and BP. Although controversial, this consortium is advancing scientific research in an environment where alternative energy funding has been conspicuously lacking.
 

Hillary Clinton (State)

     Former first lady and Democratic primary contender, Hillary Clinton is on of the most recognizable names in American politics. During her college years, she supported Barry Goldwater in 1964, but by 1972 had become transformed into a supporter of Eugene McCarthy. It is therefore ironic that her refusal to characterize her vote on the Iraq War Resolution as a mistake arguably lost her the Democratic nomination. During her distinguished career as a lawyer, first lady, bestselling author, and senator, she has established herself as a strong advocate for human rights -- a reputation that should serve her well as Secretary of State. Her books include: It Takes a Village, An Invitation to the White House: At Home with History, and Living History.
Read more about Hillary Clinton 

Tom Daschle (Health and Human Services)

     Since his demonization by the Bush administration despite his decidely moderate voting record and his narrow defeat in the 2006 senate race, respected and popular Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle has focussed on health care. His book Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis is a mixture of sound public policy and political pragmatism that should be required reading for the American voting public. Skyrocketing health-care costs are as great a threat to the economy as the Iraq War and the lack of a coherent energy policy, and we can only wish Daschle well as Secretary of HHS and director of the coming White House Office of Health Reform
Read more about Tom Daschle 

Shaun Donovan (Housing and Urban Development)

     At 41, Shaun Donovan is the youngest of the Obama nominees, but he has still assembled an impressive resumé. After completing his degree in public administration at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government and an advanced degree in architecture at the Graduate School of Design, Donovan served as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Multifamily Housing at HUD, and as an acting FHA Commisioner. In 2004 he became the head of the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development.
 

Arne Duncan (Education)

     Another youthful Obama cabinet designee, Duncan played basketball at Harvard, where he graduated magna cum laude in sociology. He became director of the Ariel Education Initiative, enhancing children's educational opportunities on Chicago's South Side in 1992. In 1998 he joined the Chicago Public Schools, where he became Deputy Chief of Staff for the Schools CEO in 1999, whom he succeded in 2001.
Read more about Arne Duncan 

Robert Gates (Defense)

     

Gates is probably the best Secretary of Defense one could expect from the ideologically-skewed Bush administration. Even as the impending redefinition of our middle east policy argues against an immediate shake-up of the top-level military command structure, those ranks have simultaneously been purged of those unwilling to endorse the nonsensical Bush Doctrine.

Gates was nominated Director of the CIA in 1987, but withdrew when it became clear that the Senate confirmation would be hampered by his role in the Iran-Contra debacle. Daddy Bush nominated him again in 1991 and he was confirmed. He retired from the CIA in 1993 and during the Clinton years occupied several positions in academia, including president of Texas A&M University.

Gates declined the junior Bush's nomination as Secretary of Homeland Security in 2001 and as Director of National Intelligence in 2005. He was appointed to the Iraq Study Group in 2006, but resigned upon his nomination as Secretary of Defense. Gates recently wrote a summary of his vision for DoD in Foreign Affairs

Gates has written three books: Iran: Time For A New Approach (with Zbigniew Brzezinski and Suzanne Maloney), From the Shadows: The Ultimate Insider's Story of Five Presidents and How They Won the Cold War ,and Understanding the New US Defense Policy Through the Speeches of Robert M. Gates

Read more About Robert M. Gates 

Timothy Geithner (Treasury)

     

As president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Geithner has been in the eye of the recent financial storm, but who is he? To be fair, Federal Reserve bankers usually keep a low public profile, so Geithener's relative anonymity isn't surprising. Washington and Wall Street insiders seem to think he is an excellent choice, which doesn't exactly fill me with confidence. On the other hand, it's hard to imagine anyone being confirmed that couldn't pass muster with those groups.

On the plus side, Geithner is said to be extremely intelligent, which can't hurt in the effort to correct the mess he's inheriting. He is also said to be very internationally-minded, and to view income-inequality as a serious problem -- two significant breaks from the current administration. Geithner was Undersecretary of the Treasury for Foreign Affairs under Secretaries Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers -- two "moderate" Clinton appointees that aren't exactly blameless in the current SNAFU. Geithner is also a member of the Group of 30.

Geithner has been enthusiastically endorsed by a couple of economists who do have significant public profiles: Former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich and recent Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman, so I guess we'll all have to give him the benefit of the doubt for now.

 

Eric Holder (Justice)

     

Despite Holder's extensive resumé, the press has generally focussed on two things: If confirmed, he would be the first African-American Attorney General (actually he has already been acting Attorney General pending Ashcroft's confirmation), and he has publicly acknowledged that he gave former president Bill Clinton questionable advice concerning the Marc Rich pardon.

I think the public should know more than that. Holder will be succeeding, in my opinion, the three worst Attorneys General in American history, and his task will be nothing less than to restore respect for the rule of law in America. He is said to be extraordinarily even-handed both as a prosecutor and as a jurist. If that means he will apply the law without prejudice to the rich and powerful as well as to the disenfranchised, great! If it means he will do the politically expedient thing to avoid rocking the boat, I fear for the Republic. Congress has already chosen that path. There is no doubt that any number of high-profile public crimes have been perpetrated on George W. Bush's watch. The question is: will the lesson be "no one is above the law", or "you can't fight city hall?"

 

Ray LaHood (Transportation)

     

Bipartisanship was a theme of the Obama campaign, but many were suprised by his nomination of outgoing Republican Congressman Ray LaHood for Secretary of Transportation, not so much because of his party affiliation as because of this relative lack of transportation credentials. LaHood is one of those populist Midwestern Republicans, said to be a decent man and a good manager. He has voted with the Democrats on a number of transportation-related issues.

One clue is that in Washington-speak "transportation" boils down to the ongoing feud between roads and rail. (Can't we have both?) In that regard, LaHood and his associations in the House of Representatives might be helpful in implementing a long-overdue overhaul of the nation's rail system. Beyond that, this one's a puzzle to me.

 

Janet Napolitano (Homeland Security)

     Janet Napolitano received her Juris Doctor degree from the University of Virginia Law School, which certainly signals a new direction for the heretofore mostly useless Department of Homeland Security. She has been an outstanding two-term Governnor of Arizona and a rising star in the Democratic party. Since her appointment will cede the Arizona governor's mansion to Republican Secretary of State Jan Brewer, one can only assume tha Obama intends to make Homeland Security a real department.
 

Bill Richardson (Commerce)

     

Democratic presidential contender and Governor of New Mexico Bill Richardson is no lightweight, and many considered him a more logical choice for Secretary of State than Hillary Clinton. Speculation is rampant that his selection for the Secretary of Commerce spot signals an increased role for Commerce in the coming administration.

Commerce touches upon several key areas of the Obama agenda, including foreign trade, technology, and environment. Richardson's skill as a negotiator will certainly be useful in reshaping the American landscape as we move away from an oil economy toward something new and more sustainable.

Richardson is the author of two books: Between Worlds: The Making of an American Life, and Leading by Example: How We Can Inspire an Energy and Security Revolution

Read more about Bill Richardson 
 

Ken Salazar (Interior)

     

Environmentalists are less than pleased with the appointment of Ken Salazar, whose record on green issues is described as "mixed." The mainstream position on environmental issues as regards the Department of the Interior has long been that we should have a "balanced" approach combining environmental protections with "constructive" use of public lands.

While this sounds reasonable, this approach has led us to the brink of gloabl catastrophe, with the best available science indicating that if we could magically reduce our carbon emissions to zero today considerable damage would already have been done which would play out over the next several decades. Salazar will not be operating in a vacuum, though, and depending upon the policies he is asked to implement, he could be a tolerable choice.

At least there is no indication a Salazar Department of Interior would exist solely to trade cocaine and hookers with representatives of the most egregious despoilers of the land.

Read more about Ken Salazar 

Eric Shinseki (Veterans Affairs)

     Former Army Chief of Staff General Shinseki is the first of many high-ranking officers demonized for telling the Bush administration the truth -- in this case that it would take hundreds of thousands of troops to stabilize post-war Iraq. He is a capable and dedicated officer who will doubtless do what he can with the antiquated mess that is the current Veteran's Administration.

I'd like to see the VA buy up the Afghani opium harvest, but that would upset the pharmaceutical companies, wouldn't it? Whatever else happens, look for Shinseki to develop innovative approaches to old problems and to rock the boat if necessary to get the job done.

Read more about Eric Shinseki 

Hilda Solis (Labor)

     

Hilda Solis is arguably the only genuine liberal in a cabinet notable for its centrist politics. As a representative for the 31st and 32nd California Congressional districts from 2000 to the present, she has had an excellent record on labor and civil rights issues. After decades of vigorous Republican Union-busting and luke-warm Democratic support, Solis just may be what the Democrats (and the country) need right now.

Read more about Hilda Solis 

Tom Vilsack (Agriculture)

     Tom Vilsack is the first Democratic Governor elected in Iowa for 30 years. He is another centrist, pick and some would say on matters of Agriculture leaning to the right. In the past he has come down on the side of large corporate farming operations on a number of issues. Note that the "free-market" zealots are strangely silent on the huge farm-subsidy budget, which although touted as friendly to the family farm actually favors agri-business. There doesn't seem to be much change in the offing here.
Read more about Tom Vilsack 

Thursday, December 18, 2008

Clean Your Tank II

It started innocently enough -- the "dual function reservoir" on my 1989 Ford F-150 got plugged up with tarry residues from the gas and the rear tank no longer worked. I didn't really have the time or money to deal with it, so I just continued to drive using the front tank only. It actually took me a long time to figure out that the problem wasn't with the rear fuel pump, which was the obvious (and wrong!) conclusion. A gummed-up fuel tank selector valve actually sends gas from the front fuel pump to the engine, then returns it to the rear tank, which eventually overflows. No wonder my gas mileage was so abysmal!

Eventually I began to have driveability problems, which I attributed to "bad gas." What I had yet to realize is that there is no "good gas." Gasoline is a terrible fuel for internal combustion engines. The tarry residues that gummed up my fuel system are a ticking time-bomb that will eventually claim any gasoline (or diesel) engine. If your car or truck has a diesel engine, Do It Yourself Biodiesel conversion is easier than you might think and well worth considering. In any case, you need to get the injector-fouling glop out of your tank.

In Clean Your Fuel Tank!, I explained how you can effectively clean your tank using commonly available household products. This is a reasonable alternative if you can't find a local shop to clean the tank, or if you just want to save some money over professional cleaning or a new tank. If you have a little background in chemistry, you won't find anything too surprising there, but others may find it a little disturbing to think about pouring Drano in their gas tank.

As I continued with my repair saga, I had to do a little research on which of the many new flavors of Permatex would be best to reconstruct the discontinued grommet that holds the anti-rollover vent in place and the gaskets for the fuel tank lock rings. (It's Permatex Ultra Rubber Gasket Sealant & Dressing.) Searching for "rust remover" in order to find the link for Permatex Naval Jelly, I happened upon the KBS Fuel Tank Sealer Kit.

If you're uncomfortable pouring corrosive chemicals into your gas tank just because some conspiracy theory wing-nut on the internet says it's a good idea, I can't blame you. On the other hand, this kit provides you with an alternative set of "store-bought" corrosive chemicals and a little confirmation if you decide to go the cheaper route. The kit consist of three products, which are also available separately:

  • AquaKlean (gallon)       Also available in quarts, this is a heavy-duty degreaser. So is Drano.
  • RustBlast (gallon)       Also available in quarts, this is a rust remover and metal etch like naval jelly. Rust Blast also leaves a zinc phosphate residue, so failure to use this may void any KBS warranties.
  • Gold Standard       is the special tank sealer coating which seems to be available only in the tank Sealer Kits, at least through Amazon.com. If your tank is already leaking, I'd recommend a new tank.
  • RustSeal (gallon)      
  •       Also available in quarts, and pints, the silver color contains metal filler for pitted surfaces. "RustSeal is so indestructibly tough it won't crack, blister or peel even when exposed to the most aggressive chemicals." Should be fine in your tank.(?)

After agonizing over the pros and cons of coating my tank, I decided that the possibility of large amounts of rust getting through my fuel filter was just too troubling. Better to completely rustproof the tank. Replacing the steel tank with polypropylene wasn't a particularly viable option in this case since the exhaust pipe comes too close to the tank. This option also typically involves replacing the fuel pump hanger, which may attach to polypropylene tanks differently than to steel tanks.

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Clean Your Fuel Tank!

I recently had the dubious pleasure of replacing the fuel tank selector valve on my 1989 Ford F-150. It's a kind of Rube Goldberg contraption that uses pressure from a low-pressure pump located in the fuel tank to operate valves that direct gas to the high pressure pump, filter, fuel injector rail and back to the tank. I really don't expect parts containing rubber diaphragms to last much more than 20 years, so I wasn't that perturbed, although the availability of this Ford-only part left much to be desired. Compared to the caucus race of locating the part (for "only" $80) installation was uneventful.

Unfortunately, the substitution didn't fix my problem. To my surprise, the valve was actually good except for being stuck in one position by the accumulation of gunk from the gas tank. (I should have checked!) In this day of skyrocketing gasoline prices, you might well want to check your tank(s), because a car will still run with a disturbing accumulation of sludge in the tank, but it will perform a lot better with a good supply of clean gas!

Siphon a little gas from your tank into a mason jar and compare its color to some clean gas from an approved container. Is it nice and light, almost clear -- or is your gas an amber yellow tending toward brown? If so, you probably have an alarming accretion of tarry goo in your tank. Gasoline, kerosene, and Diesel fuel are all petroleum distillates -- refineries simply isolate a particular class of hydrocarbons from crude oil using an elaborate "still" called a fractionating tower. They also alter their product mix by "cracking" and polymerizing, but we won't go into that -- it's enough to know that the long-chain hydrocarbons (like gear oil) are dark and viscous, while short-chain fuels are light and fluid. Gas is really just very thin oil.

Of course everybody knows you can't make 200-proof moonshine without distilling your mash more than once, and your fuel isn't all one type of hydrocarbon molecule, either -- there are lighter and heavier molecules mixed in with those with average-length chains. Over time, the shorter-chain molecules are burned or evaporate, and the longer-chain ones accumulate as a tarry sludge in the bottom of your tank. As you add gas some of this residue dissolves, adulterating your fuel -- eventually to the point where your electronic fuel injection can no longer cope with the garbage you're feeding it.

Removing your fuel tank is relatively straightforward. Generally speaking you will find a fill tube, fuel delivery and return lines, an electrical connector and a vent line to be detatched. You then only need to empty the tank and remove the bolts that secure it to the frame. If you don't already have one, a shop manual for your particular vehicle is recommended for more detailed instructions. A floor jack is helpful in this procedure, but not absolutely required.

The traditional method of cleaning a fuel tank is steam cleaning, but I was unable to find anyone who still offers this service locally. I have no idea what automotive repair shop hours are going for these days since they priced me out of the market years ago, but I suspect that if you do find someone to clean your tank, they will charge you nearly the cost of a new tank. That would account for the disappearance of the service. The prospect of taking a perfectly good tank to the landfill didn't appeal to me, so I devised the following cleaning procedures:

If the design of your tank is such that you can get your hand inside it, begin by scraping as much goo and rust from the inner surfaces as you can. This is a thankless task, but its fast and productive, so keep at it using whatever paint scrapers, putty knives, pry bars, and wire brushes you have on hand. After removing all the debris you can reach, the following procedures will be much more effective on the relatively small amounts of contaminants that remain.

Old-fashioned soap-making involved mixing grease (usually lard) with caustic soda or lye (NaOH). You can remove the oily residues from your tank with crystal drain cleaner. I used Crystal Drano, but any brand should be fine. You might also use any suitable oven cleaner. These products are hard on skin and eyes, so the use of rubber gloves and safety goggles are recommended, if not expected. You don't have to saponify all the tar in your tank, but just enough to dislodge it from the metal surfaces, so go easy on the lye and add more as required. Be sure that all the surfaces of the tank get a good soaking.

Once the tar is removed, you're likely to find hydrolyzed aluminum silicates in the tank -- better known as dirt. You can remove this by sloshing around a strong solution of laundry detergent or trisodium phosphate. Lather, rinse, repeat. When the soapy water comes out clean, you've done the best you can.

If your tank is polypropylene, count yourself lucky. If it's steel, you're going to want to do something about rust. Due to the nature of metallic bonding and the accumulation of electrical charges, "rust never sleeps," but you can slow it down a little. The "right" way to do this is by lightly sand-blasting or bead-blasting the interior of the tank. You could do the same thing with sandpaper if you could reach all the surfaces. Of course, the paper is just a convenience -- the essential abrasive is sand.

Sponge out the inside of your tank and let it dry thoroughly. Wet sand will clump together and won't expose as many jagged little surfaces as dry sand. Put a generous amount in the tank and tilt it back and forth. If you were using sandpaper, you know that the harder you pushed down the faster this would go. Unfortunately, you can't exert much pressure here, so just be patient and think of what a great work-out you're getting. Peek into the tank with a flashlight to see how you're doing. It is not necessary to sand the tank down to bright metal, you just need to remove the loose rust scale. If you like, you can use phosphoric acid (better known as naval jelly) at this point.

Don't try to remove all the rust. Your tank started out as galvinized steel, but now that the zinc coating has eroded away, the phosphoric acid can convert the thin coating of rust that remains to metalophosphate, providing at least some corrosion resistance through passivation. You can ensure that all the acid is neutralized by treating the tank with baking soda. Be sure to rinse and dry the tank thoroughly, and you're done!

If you tend to be a picky, don't let the perfect become the enemy of the good. Your tank will probably never pass a white glove test, but think of the pounds of gunk you've removed rather than the ounces or grams that remain. On the other hand, if you're a lick and a promise sort, perservere. A little elbow grease now will save you a lot of grief down the road.

If all this seems like a lot of trouble to go through, it is. I'm sure many more people will simply replace their tanks than will follow this procedure. Hopefully, a few will buy their new tanks here. On the other hand, there are some who are as stubborn as I am, and quite a few who are offended by the cultural notion that everything is disposable. If you do rehabilitate your tank, at some point it will occur to you what a poor choice petroleum fuels are. You might even wonder why gasoline is the "mainstream" choice, and gaseous fuels like methane are termed "alternative" fuels.

Consider the fact that many fleet operators converted to compressed natural gas (CNG) decades ago, because it was more cost-effective, yet there is only one production CNG car on the market today, and practically no CNG filling stations, despite the fact that anybody with natural gas and electicity can "Phill" up at home. Consider that GM built and leased an electric car, the EV1 (to comply with California's stringent emissions requirements) that everybody seemed to love, but killed it because it didn't break down and contribute to the lucrative repair side of their business.

That goo isn't just in your tank. It's in your fuel lines, fuel gauge sender, injectors, valves, cylinders -- throughout your engine really. All completely unnecessary, but very lucrative for the special interests that continue to maintain that alternative energy technologies of twenty years ago "will take decades to develop." Don't let the fact that T. Boone Pickens' plan is to make a pile of money for T. Boone Pickens distract you from the fact that cost-effective alternative energy is available now.

Further resources

Internal Combustion: How Corporations and Governments Addicted the World to Oil and Derailed the Alternatives Book
Who Killed the Electric Car? DVD
21st Century Complete Guide to Natural Gas Vehicles CD
Build Your Own Electric Vehicle Book



Monday, April 14, 2008

Top 50 "Green 3" Products @ Amazon.com

Amazon.com recently introduced a promotion in which they invited users to tag their three favorite green products "green 3." Since I personally favor averting global catastrophe, I submitted three of my current favorites: GreenPlug Energy Saver, Teaming with Microbes: A Gardener's Guide to the Soil Food Web and The Farmer's Earthworm Handbook: Managing Your Underground Money-Makers. Not only that, but I set about creating an Amazon aStore page featuring the products from the list.

I may be a slow learner, but before I got through some 450 items, it became clear to me that some brands were a bit "overrepresented." As a retailer, I'm more than happy to sell anything anybody wants to buy. Nonetheless, I must say that any recommendation implied by inclusion in this list needs to be taken with a few grains of salt. There are some great products in the list, but there are also some that I'm confident were included by zealous marketers. Same as always, I suppose.

I applaud Amazon for their initiative, but I would also like to encourage people to participate in this promotion, (which really hasn't been well-publicized) if only to make the data more credible. Adding your own items or voting a tag up or down is extremely easy and you might find some interesting money-savers by going through the list.

Amazon's "Green 3" List: 14 APR 08

Sunday, April 13, 2008

CFL - Compact Fluorescent Lighting

Everybody's getting on the environmental bandwagon these days -- in theory at least. Actually modifying behavior to save energy seems to lag behind a bit. Well, installing compact fluorescent lamps is a simple, painless way to help our struggling planet and save money at the same time. Today's CFL bulbs are much better than their predecessors, which emitted a kind of sickly off-color glow. You can get bulbs in warm (or soft) white, white, cool white, or daylight varieties which are basically equivalent to their incandescent counterparts.

These color temperatures are sometimes rated in Kelvin or K which can be a little confusing. A bulb's Kelvin rating is based on the temperature a filament would be heated to to produce a given color. Now white-hot is hotter than red-hot but red and yellow are considered "warm" colors, while (sometimes bluish) white is considered a "cool" color. So the "cool white" bulb actually has a higher K rating than the "warm white" bulb. Note that the higher K bulbs don't consume more power than the lower K bulbs; fluorescent light is produced by a different mechanism.

Another advantage of the current crop of CFLs is that they use electronic ballasts rather than the old-style inductive ballasts. This results in a much shorter delay before the light comes on and almost no flickering or stroboscopic effects. Most of these bulbs include integrated ballasts -- they simply replace regular incandescent bulbs using the familiar Edison screw bases. Amazon supplies bulbs with all the common base sizes -- candelabra commonly found on Christmas lights, the ubiquitous medium base, and the slightly larger mogul base.

The majority of the lights featured here are the common CFL Spiral form, or the brighter twin tube or triple tube varieties. There are also bulbs with different shapes such as the pointed torpedo, reflector-focussed floodlights, and smaller R20 or R30 directional lights, the A-19, A-21 or A-23 appliance bulbs, post lights, the decorative globe style, and the bullet type.

Bulbs with separate ballasts use a variety of 2-pin and 4-pin connectors, such as the Thorn 2D connector, or the Philips PL connector. One drawback to these non-integrated ballast systems is that it can be difficult to find the bulbs with the arcanely coded correct base. Base codes are numerous and intended to prevent using too powerful a bulb in a fixture (but may also prevent downgrading Wattage). Some examples are: G24D-2, G24D-3, GX23-2, GX32D-2, G24Q-1, GR10Q-4, G10Q, and TCX. This list is not exhaustive, so your best bet is to try the search box if you know the proper code.

If you don't know the code for base of the light you are replacing, you may still be able to find the correct light here. Many of the available units have information such as "replaces manufacturer model model-number" either in the specifications or the user comments. Do take a moment to read the user comments. Some are pretty useless, but most are informative, and some are absolutely indispensible.

Like their integrated-ballast cousins, non-integrated bulbs come in twin-tube and triple-tube types, as well as a number of unique form-factors. These include butterfly, circular or (GE) Circline, Sylvania's Dulux, and EIKO's FML.

In addition to the many shapes and base types, both integrated and non-integrated ballast CFLs may incorporate features not found in earlier compacts. Probably the most striking is the introduction of dimmable CFLs. These cost a bit more, as they require more complicated circuitry in their ballasts, but they are extremely popular. A simpler related product are 3-way CFLs for three way fixtures and lamps. Another popular variation are "novelty" colored lights available in red, blue, green, orange, pink, and (theoretically) blacklight. Yellow CFLs are listed as bug lights, a reference to their decreased attractiveness to bugs in outdoor use. There are also ionic bulbs that freshen the air by emitting negative ions, and high intensity bulbs (comparable to halogen incandescents) designated T3, T4, T5, etc.

CFL bulbs typically use 20% to 25% of the energy that incandescent bulbs would use to produce the same amount of light in lumens or candlepower. While the power requirements of incandescent bulbs have become standardized, CFL bulbs vary. Therefore, equivalent power ratings are often more prominently specified than actual Wattage. Common sizes include 15 Watt, 40 Watt, 60 Watt, 75 Watt, 100 Watt, and 150 Watt, although there are also many other sizes. If an area needs more light, you can safely install CFL bulbs whose actual power usage is equal to or below that stated on a fixture or lamp.

The energy savings from fluorescent lighting stem from the fact that they convert electrical power into light more efficiently than incandescent bulbs. That is, they do so with less energy waste in the form of heat. It follows that they also have an impact on heating and cooling costs. In the case of heating, the impact is negative, but the energy saved in lighting more than offsets it. (When viewed as heating elements, incandescent bulbs are inefficient because they "waste" energy by producing light.) In the case of cooling, CFL is a win / win proposition.

CFL bulbs cost more than incandescents, but typically last much longer. As of this posting, CFLs may cost 3 to 10 times what an equivalent incandescent does, but they typically last 8 to 15 times as long. This makes CFLs a good investment irrespective of their 75% - 80% energy savings. The initial cost of CFLs and their longevity are only expected to improve as they are developed further.

Our Picks

I don't usually recommend individual products, since customers presumably know what they want. I'm making an exception in this case because incandescent bulb technology is so well-established and familiar that people seem to assume that all these CFL bulbs are alike and simply pick the cheapest one(s). Unfortunately, there seems to be a good bit of "buyer's remorse" with this strategy. Remember, one advantage of CFLs is that they last much longer than incandescents, so paying a little more for a higher quality product often makes sense. You may also want to get a little higher Kelvin bulb than you are used to since many people seem to dislike the "soft white" CFLs. Shipping terms are subject to change, and are posted here for convenience ONLY.

Amazon.com - The items here are all eligible for free shipping on orders of $25 or more. If you can find what you need here, that's probably the way to go. Light Bulbs Etc, Inc. - Features Eiko & TCP bulbs. S/H $7.95/shipment. greenfeet - Featuring bulbs from Feit Electric S/H = $5.95/shipment + $0.50/lb.

Manufacturers & Vendors

Amazon features bulbs from a variety of manufacturers and third party vendors, with a wide range of features and price points. Take a little time to evaluate their merits, since the cheapest bulbs aren't always the best value.: